Patient Transport Vehicle

-
It looked like an ambulance as I passed it on the highway, but clearly written on it was Patient Transport Vehicle.

Image nabbed from here.

Comments

KayMac said…
Whew! I am SO glad this has finally been cleared up!
January 11, 2007 1:55 PM
Barbara said…
Isn't that exactly what an ambulance is -- a "patient transport vehicle"? It really has nothing to do with walking despite the root of the word!
January 11, 2007 4:08 PM
Anonymous said…
patient transport vehicle??is that a public vehicle for common passengers?

is it the same as our jeepney in the phil?
January 11, 2007 11:41 PM
Mother of Invention said…
I think it is used for the business of transporting patients to other hospitals and appointments etc. ...a bit different that an ambulance. I'm just glad not to be in one! I think that each time I see the ambulance.
January 12, 2007 1:36 PM
B said…
Yes, the word "ambulance" was apparently too confusing for the general public. "Patient transport vehicle" is so much easier to grasp for those wondering what the hell that square vehicle with flashing red lights is doing speeding down the highway!

But now that I've had my sarcastic moment, I read Mother of Invention's comment. So maybe the difference is exactly that. I'm still not satisfied. I mean, all they need to do is turn the lights off on the ambulance and drive at a reasonable speed to transport patients. Ha...I love these things!
January 12, 2007 4:26 PM
RennyBA said…
So what's the different Richard?
Wish you a lovely end to your week!
January 12, 2007 6:06 PM
TorAa said…
Oh, I thought when in this van, you had be patient. So why all the lightning and sound? That's the opposite ;-)))

Communication is easy,what?

Another "Crazy" suggestion:

Sick transportation!
January 12, 2007 6:17 PM
Mother of Invention said…
Maybe they can use the lights and siren when they're going to be late for the appointment! HA!
January 13, 2007 10:17 AM
Coffee Fairy v1 said…
I have the same thoughts as barbara. I'm more familiar with the use of ambulance though.
January 15, 2007 10:24 AM
Richard said…
kaymac: but has it? It looked very much like an ambulance to me (similar to the picture I put up – colours and wording where different),
barbara: perhaps there is some subtle difference I am not aware of. Maybe ambulances are privately operated and PTV are property of the hospital?
ghee: no, nothing like a jeepney, very much like the picture attached to the post.
MOI: I have no strong feelings for or against ambulances; I have never had to use one. I am just wondering if the label was a result of over-zealous bureaucrats looking to fill their politically correct terminology quota, or if it is to distinguish between similar, but differently purposed vehicles.
breal: Your comment is exactly what went through my head.
renny: I wish I knew.
toraa: clear communication is essential. I just don’t know if this is a case of clear communication or a clear case of politically correct communication.
coffee fairy: I agree, the question is was it an ambulance or was it a patient transport vehicle

If you search on the web, you can find pictures of Patient Transport Vehicles. The problem is that none of them looked like what I had seen.
January 15, 2007 5:10 PM
Run Around Paris said…
ambulance camouflage...
January 16, 2007 10:22 AM
Mother of Invention said…
Maybe they think that the word ambulance ALARMS too many people...ironically enough! Even non-English speaking people would know what it was when it is bright red with crosses etc. so I can't see them thinking it'd be understood better the new way.

People often freeze at sirens and don't pull over as they should...or they're too ignorant and/or hurried. I'm surprised there aren't more accidents.
January 16, 2007 6:13 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese Wisdom Concerning Money

-
[19September-2007 @ 17:11 EST: Revised preamble. This page still gets the most search hits: There is no Anthony de Croud. The e-mail is SPAM. I post things that pique my fancy at the moment. I like the 8 precepts, but the rest of the e-mail is junk. However, I thought it fair to post everything in its entirety. I did not write the e-mail. I did not forward the e-mail. I strongly encourage you not to forward it either. (I also encourage you to reply to whomever sent you the e-mail and tell them you don't appreciate getting junk mail.)] Received this in our e-mail (English translation follows): PRECEPTO CHINO SOBRE EL DINERO EL DINERO PUEDE COMPRAR UNA CASA, PERO NO UN HOGAR, EL DINERO PUEDE COMPRAR UN RELOJ, PERO NO EL TIEMPO. EL DINERO PUEDE COMPRAR UNA CAMA, PERO NO EL SUEÑO. EL DINERO PUEDE COMPRAR UN LIBRO, PERO NO EL CONOCIMIENTO. EL DINERO PUEDE PAGAR UN MÉDICO, PERO NO LA SALUD. EL DINERO PUEDE COMPRAR UNA POSICIÓN, PERO NO EL RESPETO. EL DINERO PUEDE COMPRAR LA SANGRE, PERO ...
Read more

Not quite Jacques Cousteau

-
Image
I had bought some frozen calamari (squid) a while back and decided that it was time I actually did something with them. I thawed them out and cleaned them. I have never done this before and I am sure I was horribly slow and inefficient (it took me an hour to clean 2 pounds – 907g – worth). You begin by grasping the body and pulling out the head and guts. Then you squeeze out the guck inside and then peel off the skin (or film) on the surface. As a bonus, most of the skin comes off when you squeeze out the gunk. Finally you need to remove the spine. This was news to me, I thought that squid did not have any hard structure (aside from the beaky mouth). It is an interesting piece, when removed, it looks exactly like a piece of transparent plastic. Still haven’t decided what to make with it, but I will cook it tonight. Photo credits: Richard of Forbidden Planet [Note: today, blogger forced me to change over to the new blogger. When I logged in, I could not see any way to log on to my old ...
Read more

Evolution of a peeve

-
Image
I am often peeved at the way evolution is presented and explained. It is bad enough when lay people get it wrong, but it is intolerable when science commentators and scientists explain it sloppily. First things first, the term evolution comes from the Latin evolutio meaning unrolling. In modern English vernacular is has the generally understood meaning of a progressive change in a particular direction - the general direction being understood as being better or more advanced from the previous form. This is a horrible term to use for the process Darwin described because it comes with preconceptions that are simply untrue - namely that of a progressive change in a particular direction for good (as opposed to its antonym, devolution). It also does not help that so many science commentators (all I would say) and scientists (most, I would say) continue to perpetuate this inaccuracy. The say things like, "Plants evolved colourful flowers to attract insects," or "Organisms evo...
Read more